How Accounting Firms Use AI Agents to Process Tax Returns and Financial Audits

AI agents in accounting firms are quickly moving from experiments to real production workflows. That’s because the work is already structured around repeatable steps: collecting documents, extracting numbers, reconciling accounts, building workpapers, and routing reviews. When you apply agentic AI in accounting to those steps, the gains show up fast: fewer manual touchpoints, better consistency, and more time for professional judgment where it actually matters.

But the best results come from being specific. Instead of trying to build a single “super-agent” that does everything, high-performing firms break the work into smaller agents aligned to a clear input and output. One agent might handle K-1 extraction automation. Another might run bank reconciliation automation with exception queues. A third might draft AI workpapers and audit documentation that a senior reviews and signs off.

This guide walks through end-to-end tax return automation and AI in financial audits, including where AI agents help most, where they fail, and what controls make them safe to use in a CPA environment.

What “AI Agents” Mean in Accounting (and What They Don’t)

AI agents in accounting firms aren’t just chatbots that answer questions. They’re systems designed to complete multi-step work: they can read documents, use tools, apply rules, route tasks, and produce structured outputs that map to your firm’s process.

To make the terminology practical, here’s the simplest way to separate three commonly confused concepts.

Definition: agentic AI vs. generative AI vs. RPA

Generative AI: Produces content (text, summaries, drafts) based on a prompt.

RPA: Follows pre-set rules to click through software and move data in predictable workflows.

AI agents: Combine generative AI with tool use and workflow logic to complete multi-step tasks, including decisions like “is this document missing?” or “does this variance exceed thresholds?” and then take the next action.

A quick comparison:

• Capability

Where agents fit best is the “messy middle” of accounting work: unstructured inputs (PDFs, emails, scans), multiple systems, and repeated handoffs between preparer, reviewer, and partner.

What AI agents should not do:

• Final sign-off on a tax return or audit report

• Independence decisions

• Replacing professional skepticism with automated conclusions

• Posting entries or filing returns without explicit approvals

In other words: AI assists; accountant concludes.

Why AI agents are showing up now in CPA workflows

Several pressures are converging at once:

• Deadline compression during tax season and audit fieldwork

• A growing volume of client portal uploads and email attachments

• More unstructured data than ever: PDFs, scanned forms, invoices, contracts, and statements

• A tight labor market that makes it harder to scale with headcount alone

AI agents in accounting firms are showing up now because they can absorb the repetitive coordination work that burns senior time: sorting, extracting, checking, comparing, and chasing.

The End-to-End “Agentic” Tax Return Workflow (From Intake to E-File)

Tax return automation works best when you treat the return like a pipeline. The “agentic” approach breaks the pipeline into steps where each agent has a clean job: intake, extraction, tie-out, research, review, and assembly.

Below is a practical six-step workflow that many firms can adapt, regardless of tax platform.

Step 1 — Client intake and document collection agent

The intake agent’s job is to reduce the chaos of document collection. It starts with a checklist based on prior-year returns and the current-year client profile, then manages ingestion and follow-ups.

What this agent can do well:

• Generate a tailored request list (W-2s, 1099s, K-1s, brokerage statements, deductions, entity documents)

• Ingest documents from portals and monitored inboxes

• Apply naming conventions and tag metadata (client, year, doc type, entity)

• Detect “missing docs” by comparing what arrived to what’s expected

• Route exceptions to the right staff member (for example, business returns vs. individual)

The win isn’t just speed. It’s fewer “where is this?” messages, fewer misfiled documents, and fewer last-minute scrambles.

Step 2 — Document understanding agent (OCR and extraction)

This is where document intelligence (OCR) for accounting pays off. The extraction agent reads and structures data from messy documents, then pushes it downstream.

Common targets:

• W-2: wages, withholding, employer info

• 1099: payer, amounts, categories (DIV, INT, NEC, B, etc.)

• K-1 extraction automation: partner details, income categories, credits, state items

• Brokerage statements: proceeds, cost basis, wash sales, dividends, foreign tax

Practical controls that matter:

• Flag low-quality scans and automatically request a re-upload

• Capture confidence scores for extracted fields

• Store the extracted values alongside a link to the exact source page for review

• Map to a standard import format for your tax software (even if the final import is still reviewed)

A strong extraction agent doesn’t pretend it’s perfect. It’s designed to highlight uncertainty and create an exception queue instead of silently guessing.

Step 3 — Book-to-tax and reconciliation agent

Once data is extracted, the workflow shifts from reading to tying out.

This agent supports:

• GL to trial balance tie-outs

• Source document to ledger support checks

• Prior-year variance detection and ratio checks for reasonability

• Drafting adjusting journal entries for reviewer approval (never auto-post)

This is where bank reconciliation automation and trial balance consistency checks can reduce hours of manual comparison. The key is to design the output to be reviewable, not just “done.” Good outputs look like:

• A short summary of variances that exceed thresholds

• A list of supporting documents used

• A proposed entry with a rationale and a required approval gate

Step 4 — Tax positions and research agent (with citations)

A research agent is valuable when it’s constrained. The most practical policy is: no citation, no use.

What this agent can do:

• Draft tax position memos and summaries for reviewer editing

• Outline the issue, facts, conclusion, and alternatives

• Maintain a “research trail” so a manager can see how the answer was formed

• Standardize memo format across preparers and offices

The goal is not to automate professional judgment. The goal is to reduce the time it takes to assemble a defensible first draft.

Step 5 — Review and diagnostics agent (human-in-the-loop)

Human-in-the-loop review for AI is the backbone of safe deployment in tax. The review agent prioritizes risk and makes it easier for managers to spot issues fast.

Common diagnostics include:

• Missing forms, missing signatures, missing elections

• Mismatched SSNs/EINs across documents

• Duplicate entries and repeated amounts

• Suspicious rounding patterns or inconsistent totals

• Discrepancies between extracted data and what was entered into the return

A good review agent produces a “high-risk first” dashboard so reviewers spend their time where it matters, instead of hunting for issues in a stack of PDFs.

Step 6 — Assembly, e-file package, and client delivery agent

Finally, the delivery agent helps assemble outputs and reduce last-mile friction.

Typical outputs:

• Return package assembly and e-sign request preparation

• Client-ready “what changed this year” summary in plain language

• A checklist of open questions or assumptions made

• Secure retention tagging and storage routing for your DMS

This is also where firms standardize client experience. When every client gets a consistent explanation and clean package, fewer questions come back later.

How AI Agents Support Financial Audits (Planning to Wrap-Up)

AI in financial audits is often misunderstood as “automating the audit.” In reality, audit work has many steps that are perfect for agent support: reading documents, extracting key terms, reconciling data sets, building workpapers, and tracking PBC status.

The highest-value audit automation software patterns are those that reduce administrative effort while strengthening documentation quality.

Audit planning agent (risk assessment and scoping)

Planning is document-heavy. An audit planning agent can read and summarize large volumes of prior-year and current-year materials:

• Prior-year workpapers and issue logs

• Board minutes and significant contracts

• Accounting policies and revenue recognition memos

• Debt agreements and covenants

• Entity org charts and related-party listings

Useful outputs include:

• Suggested risk areas for auditor review

• A draft audit plan aligned to those risks

• Mapping from risks to assertions and potential procedures

The agent doesn’t decide the plan. It speeds up the path to a plan the audit team agrees with.

Fieldwork agents: testing, sampling, and reconciliations

During fieldwork, agents can handle a lot of the repeatable testing preparation work:

• Bank, AR, and AP reconciliations: subledger to GL tie-outs with exception reporting

• Journal entry analysis: unusual patterns, duplicates, off-hours posting, rare accounts

• Contract review: extracting key terms, dates, performance obligations, renewal clauses, covenants

• Workpaper preparation: populating lead sheets and drafting narratives for reviewer edits

Featured snippet: Audit tasks AI agents can automate

• PBC request drafting and follow-ups

• Document classification and indexing

• Extraction of key contract terms and amounts

• Reconciliations with exception queues

• Journal entry anomaly flagging

• First-draft workpaper narratives and summaries

• Tick-and-tie assistance across PDFs and schedules

Confirmation and PBC workflow agent

PBC management is one of the most frustrating and time-consuming parts of audits. A PBC workflow agent reduces the “status chasing” that burns hours across seniors and managers.

What it can do:

• Draft PBC lists tailored to the client and engagement type

• Track status across requests, evidence received, and open items

• Send reminders, escalate overdue items, and log communications

• Auto-link received evidence to the correct workpaper and request ID

When this is done well, you get cleaner audit documentation and fewer last-minute evidence gaps.

Wrap-up agent: disclosures, reporting, and documentation help

Wrap-up is where consistency and completeness matter. An agent can help:

• Draft footnote checklists and tie disclosures back to the trial balance

• Summarize unresolved items and decisions from the issues log

• Draft management letter points for review and refinement

• Prepare engagement quality review packages with clear evidence links

The principle remains the same: agents draft and organize; auditors approve and conclude.

Common Use Cases (Quick Wins vs. Advanced Agentic Workflows)

Not every firm should start with end-to-end automation. The fastest path is usually a few targeted use cases that reduce manual work without increasing risk.

Quick wins (low risk, high ROI)

These are easiest to implement and easiest to govern:

• Document classification and indexing in your DMS

• PBC tracking, reminders, and status reporting

• First-draft summaries of client support documents

• Tick-and-tie assistance for workpaper prep

These quick wins build trust internally because staff can see the value while maintaining full control.

Medium complexity (needs stronger controls)

These use cases benefit from strong thresholds, audit trails, and reviewer queues:

• Auto-reconciliation with exception reporting

• Drafted variance explanations for reviewer approval

• K-1 extraction automation with roll-forward comparisons and anomaly flags

Medium complexity is often where firms feel the biggest time savings, but it’s also where controls become non-negotiable.

Advanced (requires strong governance)

These are best once you’ve already proven value and built the control model:

• Multi-agent orchestration across intake, extraction, posting prep, and review

• Continuous audit monitoring for select clients with stable systems

• Multi-entity consolidation support, including intercompany detection and reconciliation

Advanced workflows can be transformative, but they must be designed around approvals, logging, and exception handling from day one.

Controls, Compliance, and Risk Management (The Non-Negotiables)

AI agents in accounting firms only work long-term if partners trust the output and clients trust the safeguards. That means governance isn’t a “phase two.” It’s part of the design.

Human-in-the-loop review model

Human-in-the-loop review for AI should be formalized with clear approval gates. A practical model looks like this:

• Preparer approval: confirms extraction is reasonable and inputs are complete

• Manager approval: signs off on tie-outs, diagnostics exceptions, and any proposed adjustments

• Partner approval: reviews high-risk items, tax positions, and any judgment-heavy conclusions

Just as important: every handoff should be recorded. The best workflows keep an audit trail of:

• Prompts and instructions used

• Sources and documents referenced

• Output versions and timestamps

• Approvals, rejections, and comments

Data security and privacy (PII/FTI/PHI considerations)

CPA firms handle highly sensitive data: PII, financial records, and sometimes FTI or health-adjacent documentation depending on client industries.

Minimum expectations for any agent workflow:

• Encryption in transit and at rest

• Role-based access controls that mirror your firm structure

• Retention and deletion policies aligned to engagement needs

• Segmented workspaces by client and engagement to prevent leakage

• Vendor due diligence processes (often including SOC 2 reviews)

The operational rule is simple: sensitive client data should not be flowing into non-approved tools or unmanaged inboxes.

Accuracy risks: hallucinations, extraction errors, and automation bias

Tax and audit workflows have three main failure modes:

• Hallucinations in narrative outputs (memos, summaries, explanations)

• Extraction errors from low-quality scans or unusual forms

• Automation bias, where staff accept output because “the system said so”

Controls that work in practice:

• Confidence scoring for extracted fields and routing low-confidence items to review

• Exception queues instead of silent auto-corrections

• Dual control thresholds for high-impact numbers (large variances, major entries)

• “No citation, no use” for research outputs and position memos

Audit quality and standards alignment (practical framing)

AI agents should strengthen audit quality, not weaken it. That means keeping core principles at the center:

• Independence is a policy and governance issue, not a model setting

• Professional skepticism cannot be automated

• Documentation should become more complete, consistent, and searchable with AI support

A helpful rule to adopt firm-wide: AI assists; auditor or accountant concludes.

Tech Stack Blueprint: What a CPA Firm Needs to Deploy AI Agents

Getting value from AI agents in accounting firms isn’t about adding another chat tool. It’s about connecting agents to the systems your teams already use and ensuring every step is governed.

Core systems agents connect to

Most agentic workflows need to interact with:

• Tax software and e-file workflows

• Audit platforms and workpaper systems

• Document management systems (DMS)

• Practice management, CRM, and client portals

• Accounting systems like QuickBooks, NetSuite, Sage, or Xero

• Bank feeds and statement sources

Even if your first deployment is “documents only,” you’ll get more value when the agent can route and reconcile across systems of record.

Enablers: data layer and workflow orchestration

The difference between a demo and a durable workflow is orchestration.

Key enablers include:

• Data ingestion: APIs, email ingestion, and portal ingestion with tagging

• A document store with metadata, versioning, and permissions

• A workflow engine: routing, approvals, SLAs, and exception queues

• Logging and monitoring: needed for audit trails and quality management

Without those pieces, tax return automation tends to break down the moment a client uploads a weird form or an engagement deviates from the “happy path.”

Build vs. buy decision

Most firms land on a hybrid approach:

• Buy when you need speed, proven controls, and repeatable patterns

• Build when you have a truly differentiating workflow or special integration needs

• Hybrid when you want to standardize core processes but still tailor by service line

The right decision depends less on firm size and more on how standardized your processes are today.

Where platforms like StackAI fit

In practice, many firms need a layer that helps them prototype and operationalize agent workflows with governance in mind. A platform approach is especially useful for repeatable internal processes like:

• Intake triage and document workflows

• OCR extraction pipelines with exception handling

• QA checks and reviewer dashboards

• Routing approvals and creating audit trails across steps

The goal is to make agentic AI in accounting practical: secure, controlled, and easy to iterate as you learn.

Implementation Roadmap (30–60–90 Days)

A realistic rollout plan keeps scope tight, proves value quickly, and builds controls before scaling.

Day 0–30: Pick one workflow and baseline it

Start with one narrow use case such as K-1 extraction automation plus a roll-forward comparison.

Baseline metrics before changing anything:

• Cycle time per return or workpaper section

• Rework rate (how often reviewers send it back)

• Reviewer hours spent on tie-outs and diagnostics

• Error rate detected during review or post-delivery

Pick a workflow with high volume and clear success criteria.

Day 31–60: Add guardrails and integrate

Now add the controls that make the workflow safe:

• Approval gates and role-based permissions

• Logging for prompts, outputs, document sources, and versions

• Connection to your DMS or portal plus one system of record (tax or audit)

This phase is where you turn an internal pilot into something you can trust during busy season.

Day 61–90: Scale and standardize

Expand to 3–5 use cases across tax and audit.

What scaling looks like:

• Playbooks and templates for staff to follow

• Standard exception queues and reviewer dashboards

• Training that teaches staff how to validate outputs, not just generate them

• A quarterly governance review for quality findings, security checks, and exceptions trends

The firms that win treat deployment like process improvement, not a one-time tool rollout.

Conclusion: The practical future of AI agents in accounting firms

AI agents in accounting firms aren’t about replacing CPAs. They’re about removing friction from the workflows that slow down great work: document chaos, manual extraction, repetitive tie-outs, and endless status chasing. When tax return automation and AI in financial audits are designed as agentic workflows with clear approval gates, firms gain speed without giving up control.

The most reliable path is simple: start narrow, measure results, build exception handling, and expand one workflow at a time. That’s how you go from a promising pilot to a repeatable system that improves quality and consistency across engagements.

Book a StackAI demo: https://www.stack-ai.com/demo